I really like the idea of being playful with web design. I’ve used glyphs a few times in some other design classes, but it was more as an “accented decoration” I guess I would call it. I like the idea of using them excessively to create imagery, whether it be overlapping or creating “concrete poetry” like the article mentioned. I visited a few of the sites like 㐃.net and although it wasn’t super interactive, I liked how it was almost like a performance piece. I wonder how different it would have been if the viewer had to refresh the page rather than doing it on its own? I really like the idea of being playful with web design. I’ve used glyphs a few times in some other design classes, but it was more as an “accented decoration” I guess I would call it. I like the idea of using them excessively to create imagery, whether it be overlapping or creating “concrete poetry” like the article mentioned. I visited a few of the sites like 㐃.net and although it wasn’t super interactive, I liked how it was almost like a performance piece. I wonder how different it would have been if the viewer had to refresh the page rather than doing it on its own? I really like the idea of being playful with web design. I’ve used glyphs a few times in some other design classes, but it was more as an “accented decoration” I guess I would call it. I like the idea of using them excessively to create imagery, whether it be overlapping or creating “concrete poetry” like the article mentioned. I visited a few of the sites like 㐃.net and although it wasn’t super interactive, I liked how it was almost like a performance piece. I wonder how different it would have been if the viewer had to refresh the page rather than doing it on its own? I really like the idea of being playful with web design. I’ve used glyphs a few times in some other design classes, but it was more as an “accented decoration” I guess I would call it. I like the idea of using them excessively to create imagery, whether it be overlapping or creating “concrete poetry” like the article mentioned. I visited a few of the sites like 㐃.net and although it wasn’t super interactive, I liked how it was almost like a performance piece. I wonder how different it would have been if the viewer had to refresh the page rather than doing it on its own? I really like the idea of being playful with web design. I’ve used glyphs a few times in some other design classes, but it was more as an “accented decoration” I guess I would call it. I like the idea of using them excessively to create imagery, whether it be overlapping or creating “concrete poetry” like the article mentioned. I visited a few of the sites like 㐃.net and although it wasn’t super interactive, I liked how it was almost like a performance piece. I wonder how different it would have been if the viewer had to refresh the page rather than doing it on its own? I really like the idea of being playful with web design. I’ve used glyphs a few times in some other design classes, but it was more as an “accented decoration” I guess I would call it. I like the idea of using them excessively to create imagery, whether it be overlapping or creating “concrete poetry” like the article mentioned. I visited a few of the sites like 㐃.net and although it wasn’t super interactive, I liked how it was almost like a performance piece. I wonder how different it would have been if the viewer had to refresh the page rather than doing it on its own?